How to Open a Sober Living Home in San Jose, CA: A 2026 Startup Guide

Opening a sober living home in San Jose means clearing three layers of rule at once, and only one of them is hard. California does not license a non-clinical recovery residence, because Health and Safety Code section 11834.02 ties licensure to services such as detoxification, counseling sessions and treatment planning rather than to housing, and San Jose permits the use outright, with its own zoning category for it and no conditional use permit at any resident count (San Jose Municipal Code Table 20-50). What San Jose adds instead is an annual operating permit, and what Santa Clara County controls is the money, screening every publicly funded recovery bed through one call center, in a county that recorded 275 overdose deaths in 2024 and counted 10,711 people experiencing homelessness in 2025 against only 239 licensed residential treatment beds.

What follows is specific to San Jose: how the municipal code classifies the home, the annual permit that classification triggers, the departments that issue it, the February 2026 ordinance that removed the old permit barrier, the local rent and purchase anchors, and the agencies that decide whether beds stay full. Statewide rules, the CCAPP certification process and the full cost and revenue model live in the California guide. The shared California figures are restated here and adjusted only where San Jose actually changes them, which on this page means the property lines and nothing else.

Watch: How to Start a Sober Living Home in California

The video walks the California sequence end to end: the line between housing and treatment that decides whether state licensure applies, what CCAPP certification involves, how zoning review works, and what a startup budget has to cover. Everything after it on this page applies that sequence to San Jose, where the zoning answer is unusually clean and the permitting answer is not.

The California book covers the same ground in print, with the checklists and templates an operator needs on day one.

The state playbook

Ready to open a home in California?

Buy direct · $44.99Amazon · $49.99

Is San Jose a Good Place to Open a Sober Living Home?

Yes, on the lease path. San Jose gives an operator something most California cities do not, a zoning code that names unlicensed recovery housing and permits it by right in every residential district, alongside real demand and the strongest market conditions in the state. The caveats are price and paperwork: a county median sale price near $2 million makes the purchase path very hard to underwrite, and the same classification that permits the use pulls the home into an annual city operating permit most operators do not know exists.

Recovery Housing Demand in Santa Clara County

Residents reach a San Jose recovery home through three pipelines, and each behaves differently. Which one your house is built for decides where you site it and whom you call first.

• Treatment discharges: Eight licensed residential facilities operate countywide and six of them sit inside San Jose, so the discharge planners who decide where someone goes next are a short drive away rather than a county away.
• The justice system: Adult probation supervised an average of 5,749 people in August 2026, and the Superior Court runs its Drug Treatment Court, Veterans Treatment Court and Parole Reentry Court out of a single Collaborative Courts division.
• The homelessness response: The county-funded housing system moves people indoors through one hotline, and the share of that population reporting a substance use disorder is the slice a structured recovery home is built for.

The figures below are the ones a lender, a landlord or a discharge planner asks about before they take a new operator seriously.

California scores 8 out of 10 on the Operating Climate Score and is classified as moderately regulated (Foote, 2026), fourth among the fifty states. Its highest sub-index scores are market strength at 10 and operator funding access at 10, and its lowest is fire and building feasibility at 5. San Jose is a large part of what that market strength score reflects: close to a million residents, a countywide licensed residential capacity of 239 beds, and rents high enough that shared structured housing is often the only independent living a person in early recovery can afford.

Free · 14 pagesThe Your State Sober Living Starter Kit

Most people ask whether they are allowed to open a recovery home. The better first question is whether the need and the money are there. This answers both, for your state.

• How many people need a bed, and how few beds exist
• Who actually pays the rent, and which programs are real
• What it costs to open on the purchase path and the lease path

Send me the Starter KitArrives by email in a couple of minutes. Unsubscribe in one click.

How to Open a Sober House in San Jose: Step-by-Step

The statewide sequence lives in the California guide. The San Jose order below puts the property and the household test ahead of the certification application, because here the property decision is the one that cannot be undone: at a county median of $1,955,000 the purchase path rarely pencils, and the lease signed in month one sets the margin for every month after. Plan on six to nine months from first search to first resident.

Ten steps, in the order a San Jose operator actually meets them.

The phases below follow the step order above and overlap in practice.

Timelines are estimated. What adds months in San Jose is almost always the property. An unpermitted bedroom conversion found late can add a full permit cycle, escrow on a purchase near two million dollars runs longer than a lease negotiation, and CCAPP inspector availability is outside anyone control.

Best Neighborhoods for a Sober Living Home in San Jose

A workable San Jose address passes four tests, and price alone decides none of them.

• Bedroom Count: The margin is set by beds, and the geography splits cleanly: the pre-war core offers two and three bedrooms, while the 1960s to 1990s tract subdivisions in the south and east offer four and five.
• Rail Access: A resident without a license has to reach work, meetings and appointments, so a walkable light rail or BART station does more for retention than a second garage bay does.
• Off-Street Parking: Parking is the complaint that turns a quiet house into a code enforcement call, and a driveway that holds three or four cars settles it before anyone dials.
• HOA Covenants: The large-home subdivisions carry homeowner associations whose covenants speak to occupancy and to single housekeeping units, and that language has to be read parcel by parcel before an offer goes in.

Six areas follow. Housing character comes from the City of San Jose community, urban village and specific plans, transit from the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and the rail operators, and the citywide housing figures from the American Community Survey.

Whatever the area, the same three features decide whether a specific house works.

• Four or More Bedrooms: Bed count is the entire revenue line, and a three-bedroom house in this market rarely carries its own lease, let alone a mortgage.
• Two or More Full Bathrooms: One bathroom shared by eight or more residents produces the daily friction that ends tenancies, and it is one of the first things a CCAPP inspector counts.
• Parking for Three or More: Off-street parking is what keeps the house invisible to the block, which is worth more here than any argument about rights.

Fifteen cities share Santa Clara County with San Jose and not one of them shares its zoning code. Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, Milpitas, Campbell, Cupertino, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Los Gatos, Saratoga, Morgan Hill and Gilroy each run their own definitions and permit requirements, and unincorporated land runs under the county ordinance, so an address a mile past the city limit is a separate piece of research.

Who Regulates Sober Living Homes in San Jose?

No single agency regulates a sober living home in San Jose. The state licenses treatment rather than housing, and the California Department of Health Care Services draws that line around the services a program provides. The city controls land use, building, fire and business registration and is the only layer that issues a permit specific to this use, while Santa Clara County controls the money and, through it, the referrals.

A sober living home is a shared residence where people in recovery live under house rules, pay their own rent, and receive no treatment on site. That last clause is what keeps it outside state licensure, because the licensable services are detoxification, individual and group sessions, educational sessions, recovery or treatment planning and incidental medical services, and a home providing none of them is housing. San Jose is unusual in having written a version of the same line into its own zoning code, where the deciding factor is compensation for services rather than the number of residents.

For an operator, the summary is short.

• State license: Not required for a non-clinical recovery residence, and it is adding clinical services that changes the answer.
• City license: Required. A residential service facility needs an annual residential occupancy permit before anyone moves in.
• Certification: Voluntary under state law, and close to mandatory in practice for anyone who wants county referrals.
• Referrals: Controlled by the county, through one screened call center rather than an open list.

Licensing is the easy layer in San Jose and registration is the fiddly one. Zoning, the layer that stops operators in most California cities, is the layer this city has already settled, and how that happened is worth knowing before anyone tells you otherwise.

San Jose Zoning Laws for Sober Living Homes

San Jose has no sober living ordinance, no spacing requirement, no concentration cap, no resident cap and no registry as of September 14, 2026. A search of the City Legistar council file system and the Planning Division ordinance list on that date found no San Jose measure restricting recovery residences, and the only recent action on the subject removed a restriction rather than adding one. What governs instead is the zoning code use classification, and San Jose is one of the few California cities whose code names this use at all.

How the San Jose Municipal Code Treats a Sober Living Home

The code carries the category outright, which is rarer than it sounds. Three definitions decide which side of the line a house falls on, and the deciding factor is compensation for services rather than headcount.

• Residential Service Facility: SJMC 20.200.1030 defines it as a residential facility, other than a residential care facility or single housekeeping unit, where the operator receives compensation for the provision of personal services in addition to housing, and adds that it includes unlicensed group homes that provide nonmedical care and peer and other supportive services for their residents disability needs.
• Residential Care Facility: SJMC 20.200.1010 covers only facilities licensed by the State of California, including licensed group homes, which is why an unlicensed recovery residence is never analysed under this heading.
• Where Each Is Permitted: The codified use table carries residential service facility as a single row marked P, permitted, in R-1, R-2, R-M and R-MH, with no six-or-fewer split and no footnote, while a residential care facility of seven or more carries a C for conditional use permit. The City own zoning ordinance update page states that group homes and residential service facilities of seven or more residents are a permitted use and no longer require a conditional use permit.
• Group Home: SJMC 20.200.445, added in 2026, describes a one-family dwelling operating as a single housekeeping unit where an operator provides 24-hour care, and it feeds the two categories above rather than standing as its own line in the use tables.

A San Jose recovery home is analysed as a household when it really runs as one, and as a residential service facility when the operator is paid for services on top of rent. The consequence is not a zoning problem, since both are permitted everywhere residential. It is a permitting one, because SJMC 17.20.500 lists residential service facilities among the uses that must hold an annual residential occupancy permit, and most compensated operators do not discover that until a code enforcement officer explains it.

What the Six-or-Fewer Rule Does and Does Not Do

Operators arrive quoting a six-or-fewer rule that supposedly makes any small sober living home immune from local zoning. The rule is real, and it does not cover them.

• Health and Safety Code 1566.3: Requires a state-licensed residential facility serving six or fewer people to be treated as a residential use and its residents as a family, and City of Torrance v. Transitional Living Centers held that it preempts contrary local zoning.
• Health and Safety Code 11834.23: Bars a city from requiring a conditional use permit for a licensed alcohol or drug recovery or treatment facility serving six or fewer residents on any basis a single-family dwelling would not face.
• Unlicensed Homes: Neither statute reaches them, because both are built around state licensure and a peer-run recovery residence holds no license. San Jose own code makes the same split, reserving the residential care facility category for state-licensed facilities alone.

The protection that actually applies comes from disability law. People in recovery from substance use disorder are protected under the federal Fair Housing Act, and the 1999 joint statement of the Department of Justice and HUD sets out how the Act limits local control of group living arrangements, while noting that current users of illegal drugs are not covered by it. California adds Government Code 65008, which voids a local land-use action that denies a person a residence on a protected basis, and San Jose carries its own reasonable accommodation chapter at Title 20 Chapter 20.160. Where a city applies a rule to a recovery home that it would not apply to a household, sober living zoning protections and the process for requesting reasonable accommodation are the two routes that actually move it.

How HCD Letter 1749 Produced Ordinance 31298

The live regulatory action in San Jose ran in the operator favor. On September 26, 2025 the Housing Accountability Unit of the California Department of Housing and Community Development sent the City letter HAU 1749, addressed to the Director of Planning and titled for the City group home ordinance. It found that restricting residential service facilities to certain zones and requiring a conditional use permit for seven or more occupants conflicted with state law, and it stated that the City cannot require a conditional use permit for a residential service facility on the basis that its occupants include seven or more unrelated persons.

1. Treat group homes of seven or more residents under the same health, safety and zoning rules that apply to any single-family dwelling, the direction Housing Element Strategy P-42 already carried.
2. Remove the conditional use permit requirement that applied to residential service facilities above that threshold.
3. Bring the zoning code into line with state anti-discrimination law and the duty to affirmatively further fair housing.

What changed on February 3, 2026 was the permit requirement, not the classification. The Planning Commission recommended the amendments 9 to 0 with one member absent on November 19, 2025, the Council took the package up in January and adopted Ordinance No. 31298 at final reading, and the codified use table now carries residential service facility as a single permitted row. Nothing in it removed the residential occupancy permit and nothing in it created a cap. The direction matters because the case law has been moving the same way for thirty years.

• City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., 514 U.S. 725 (1995): Held that a zoning code definition of family restricts who may compose a household rather than capping occupancy, so it is not exempt from Fair Housing Act challenge.
• Pacific Shores Properties, LLC v. City of Newport Beach, 730 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2013): Held that a facially neutral ordinance regulating group homes is unlawful disparate treatment where the evidence shows it was enacted because of animus toward the disabled people who live in them.
• HUD Office of General Counsel memorandum, September 25, 2025: Withdrew the 2016 joint statement on state and local land use laws and the Fair Housing Act, so cite the 1999 joint statement instead. The withdrawal changes agency guidance, not the statute and not the decisions above.
• SoCal Recovery, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, No. 20-55820 (9th Cir. 2023): Held that a sober living operator may show its residents are disabled under the Fair Housing Act and the ADA through collective evidence of its admission and operating policies, without proving each resident disability individually.

For an operator today, the file means three things.

1. Nothing in San Jose requires a conditional use permit for a recovery residence at any resident count, and anyone who says otherwise is working from the pre-2026 code.
2. Watch PP25-008, council file 26-951, scheduled for the City Council on September 15, 2026, which would make reasonable accommodation requests ministerial with a 30-day decision and cut the fee from $10,439 to a $796 base.
3. Keep the HCD letter and the ordinance on file, because the fastest way to end an unproductive conversation with a planner is to hand them the City own documents.

Unincorporated Santa Clara County: The Community Care Test

Past the city limit the county ordinance governs, and it is stricter in every way that matters. Unincorporated pockets around San Jose, along with Alum Rock and the hill areas east and south of the city, run under the county zoning ordinance, which carries no residential service facility category at all and defines family as persons living as a single, nonprofit household.

• Community Care: The county licensed category, split at section 2.10.040 into limited facilities serving six or fewer and expanded facilities serving more than six, and defined by reference to Health and Safety Code section 1502, which reaches licensed facilities rather than peer-run recovery homes.
• The Use Permit: An expanded community care facility requires a use permit in the R1, R1E, RHS and R2 districts, so the by-right answer that holds inside San Jose does not travel across the city line.
• Room-Rental Cap: Section 2.10.030 lets a resident family rent rooms to no more than two other individuals before the use becomes a rooming house, and rooming houses need a use permit in R1, R1E and R2. In practice a compensated recovery home outside city limits is a use permit application rather than a by-right use.

San Jose Fire and Building Code Rules for Sober Living Homes

A peer-run sober living home in a single-family house stays in Group R-3, the one- and two-family dwelling classification, as long as it houses 16 or fewer residents and provides no care. Two things move it out: the resident count and whether anyone is providing custodial or personal care. San Jose adopted the 2025 California codes for permit applications filed on or after January 1, 2026, and its fire code sits in its own chapter, SJMC Chapter 17.12, rather than inside the building title.

• The Resident-Count Line: Above 16 residents in a congregate arrangement the house leaves R-3 for R-2, and where care is provided it lands in R-4 at six to 16 residents or, once licensed for 24-hour care at six or fewer, in the California-only R-3.1. Crossing any of those lines turns a house purchase into a construction project.
• Certificate of Occupancy: Group R-3 is expressly exempt from the certificate of occupancy requirement, but SJMC 24.02.620 bars a change in the character or use of a building except as the building code allows, so a house that crosses out of R-3 needs the certificate, full plan review and fire review before anyone occupies it.
• The Fire Department Scope: The Bureau of Fire Prevention runs plan review, operational permits and complaint response, and has authority to inspect as often as necessary. A fire clearance is generated when a state licensing agency submits the request, which is not what an unlicensed recovery residence is, so nobody will prompt you to comply.

Alarms are where first-time operators fall short of both the code and the CCAPP inspection, and the requirements below apply to every dwelling in San Jose regardless of who lives in it.

Nothing inspects a single-family house in San Jose on a schedule unless it holds a residential occupancy permit, which means compliance sits entirely with the operator until a complaint arrives. Work out how many beds the house can lawfully and comfortably hold before the CCAPP site visit rather than after, using the arithmetic in determining maximum occupancy. A home that fails on bed count fails on the day an inspector is standing in it.

How Much Does It Cost to Open a Sober House in San Jose?

The California reference figures are the floor. Opening a 14-bed home runs $52,572 to $55,830 statewide on the lease path and $210,937 on the purchase path once a 20% down payment is counted, before the lines a carrier or a city can only quote locally. San Jose leaves the furnishing, supplies, deposit, marketing and reserve lines exactly where the state model puts them and changes two inputs, the lease anchor and the purchase anchor, which between them decide which path is viable at all.

Two lines change, and one of them changes the decision.

• Purchase path: Swapping the model $158,695 down payment for $391,000, which is 20% of the Santa Clara County median, lifts the purchase-path subtotal to roughly $443,000. That is estimated from a published county median rather than a specific property, and it still excludes closing costs, inspection, appraisal and any permit work an unpermitted bedroom turns up.
• Lease path: The lease anchor moves far less. Two to three months at the fiscal year 2027 four-bedroom fair market rent is $9,376 to $14,064 against the model $6,516 to $9,774, and $4,688 a month is the figure to test a landlord quote against before negotiating.

Local offsets are thin, and honest planning treats them as absent.

• County Contracting: Santa Clara County does fund a recovery residential tier, but a bed only becomes reachable after vendor registration with county procurement, a competitive award, an executed contract and credentialing. None of that is money at opening.
• Resident Vouchers: The Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara publishes payment standards effective January 1, 2026 that a voucher holder can bring to a room, but the voucher belongs to the resident rather than the operator and cannot be counted before a specific person is placed.

Neither of these is a grant, neither arrives before opening, and neither is a reason to sign a lease you could not otherwise carry. Every figure in the table above comes out of the operator pocket or a lender, and county money, where it comes at all, arrives after beds are already full.

Is a Sober Living Home Profitable in San Jose?

Yes, on the lease path, and that condition carries more weight in San Jose than anywhere else in California. The California reference model runs 14 beds at $1,040 a bed a month, producing $10,959 in monthly revenue against $5,955 of operating costs, $5,004 of net operating income, a 45.7% margin and breakeven at 39% occupancy, roughly five beds. San Jose changes two inputs only, the mortgage principal and interest and the property tax, and on the purchase path those two are enough to take the model under water.

The score is a statewide reading, and San Jose sharpens both sides of it: the rents behind market strength are among the highest in California, and so is the purchase price behind the capital return. The table below restates the California model and scales only the two property lines.

The adjustment holds revenue, rent per bed and every non-property expense at the California model figures and scales only the mortgage and the property tax, so it is an estimate built on a published county median rather than a quote on a house. On the purchase path the model does not clear: net operating income falls to roughly negative $1,694 a month and breakeven rises to 87% occupancy. On the lease path it holds, because substituting the $4,688 fair market rent for the model $3,258 lease line leaves about $5,040 of net operating income and a breakeven near 41%, within two points of the statewide figure.

• The Lease-Versus-Buy Decision: It moves the margin further than any operating line can, because the gap between the two paths here is roughly $6,600 a month, several times the size of every controllable expense combined.
• Occupancy Discipline: At a 41% lease breakeven the house is profitable from six beds, and every bed above that is close to pure margin, so the pace of admissions matters more than any cost-cutting available to you.
• The House Mentor Bed: One unpaid bed is 7% of revenue in a 14-bed house, and in a market this expensive it remains the cheapest supervision an operator can buy.

Your property will not match the model. Running your own numbers takes a few minutes, and it is the difference between a plan and a hope.

How to Get Residents for a Sober Living Home in San Jose

Santa Clara County controls publicly funded placement, and it controls it through one telephone number rather than a list anyone can join. Private pay, treatment and hospital discharge, and the courts fill everything the county does not.

• The Behavioral Health Services Call Center, (800) 704-0900: Open 24 hours, it screens every caller, routes them to a substance use assessment that sets the level of care, and then authorizes placement. The county publishes it as the single access point for all substance use and mental health treatment, and every contracted provider lists it instead of a direct intake line.
• Recovery Residential (Transitional Housing): The named recovery-housing tier of the county continuum, offered for men, women, pregnant women, women with children and people with co-occurring disorders, with placement authorized only through the call center. Reaching it as a provider runs through the county eSourcing platform, a competitive solicitation, an executed contract and credentialing.
• Certification: Santa Clara County contracts and credentials providers rather than publishing a certification mandate, and CCAPP certification is what puts a home in the searchable directory discharge planners and families actually use. That combination is why certification behaves like a referral requirement here even though no county document makes it one.

Twelve organizations follow, public agencies first, because in this county the public agencies hold both the money and the screening while the nonprofits hold the volume.

Neither fellowship refers formally, and both fill houses. The Intergroup Central Office of Santa Clara County runs a 24-hour helpline at (408) 370-1815 and keeps the county meeting schedule, and Greater San Jose Area Narcotics Anonymous publishes a 24-hour helpline at (408) 998-4200. Meeting secretaries and long-time sponsors are how a large share of residents actually find a bed, and none of them will know your house exists unless you show up.

If you are reading this because you or someone close to you needs a bed rather than a business plan, the link below is the faster route.

Common Mistakes When Opening a Sober House in San Jose

The errors below are the ones that show up in San Jose homes struggling in year one, and four of the five happen before the first resident moves in.

• Signing Before the Classification Question Is Settled: A compensated operator is a residential service facility under SJMC 20.200.1030 whether or not anyone has said so, and the annual residential occupancy permit and its inspection cycle follow the classification rather than the intention.
• Budgeting a Purchase From the Statewide Model: The California model assumes a $793,476 property. At the Santa Clara County median the mortgage line roughly doubles, net operating income goes negative, and breakeven moves from 39% to 87% occupancy.
• Planning Around a Zoning Fight That Is Over: San Jose settled this in February 2026 in the operator favor, and money spent on a conditional use permit strategy is money spent on a requirement the City has already removed.
• Buying a House With Unpermitted Bedrooms: The bedrooms that make the pro forma work are often the ones that were never permitted, and SJMC 24.01.130 makes that unlawful regardless of who occupies them, with investigation fees and possible light, ventilation and egress failures attached.
• Treating County Beds as the Business Plan: Placement runs through one screened call center, and a bed only becomes reachable after vendor registration, a competitive award, a contract and credentialing. Nothing in that sequence pays a mortgage in month three.

The book covers the same ground in print, and the California Blueprint carries the funding, legal, insurance and operating detail a first home needs.

Two ways to build

Start with the book. Go all the way with the Blueprint.

The book gives you the map to open a home. When you’re ready to launch, certify, and sustain, the Blueprint is the full playbook covering funding, legal, insurance, and operations.

Get the bookExplore the Blueprint

Frequently Asked Questions About Opening a Sober House in San Jose

Your San Jose Sober House Startup Checklist

Every item below is covered somewhere above, and none of them is optional in this city. Work top to bottom, because several of them are far cheaper to settle before an offer than after one.

Four guides cover the parts of this that work the same way in every city.

How VSL Helps You Open a Sober House in San Jose

Vanderburgh Sober Living charters independently operated recovery homes into a cooperative network across more than a dozen states, and most Chartered Operators opened their first home with no prior experience at all. The support is aimed squarely at the places this page kept returning to: deciding whether a specific San Jose address passes the household test, reading a lease against the $4,688 fair market rent anchor before signing it, getting the residential occupancy permit and the CCAPP application right the first time, and building the referral relationships that decide whether beds fill in month three.

There are two routes in. The self-paced Launchpad course takes an operator through startup independently, while the Mastery Program is the done-with-you version, carrying direct support through certification, opening and the first year of operating. If you have a specific San Jose address in mind, or you are weighing a lease against a purchase at these prices, a conversation with someone who has done it here is worth more than another spreadsheet.

Research & Sources

1. Foote, H. T. (2026). Vanderburgh Sober Living Operating Climate Index, 2026 Edition. Vanderburgh Sober Living. https://www.vanderburghhouse.com/research/operating-climate-index-2026/
2. California Legislature. (2026). Health and Safety Code section 11834.02. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=11834.02
3. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code chapter 20.30, part 2, residential district use table (Table 20-50). Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.30REZODI_PT2USAL
4. County of Santa Clara Public Health Department. (2026). Overdose data in Santa Clara County. https://odfree.santaclaracounty.gov/overdose-data-santa-clara-county
5. County of Santa Clara. (2025). County of Santa Clara releases preliminary results of the 2025 point-in-time homeless count. https://news.santaclaracounty.gov/county-santa-clara-releases-preliminary-results-2025-point-time-homeless-count
6. California Health and Human Services Agency. (2026). Substance use disorder recovery and treatment facilities [Data set]. CHHS Open Data Portal. https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/sud-recovery-treatment-facilities
7. County of Santa Clara. (2025). Santa Clara County point-in-time count 2025: Executive summary. https://files.santaclaracounty.gov/exjcpb1571/2025-09/santa-clara-county-point-in-time-count-2025-executive-summary.pdf
8. Santa Clara County Probation Department. (2026). Adult monthly average daily population, August 2026. https://files.santaclaracounty.gov/exjcpb1486/2026-09/2026_08_adult-monthly-average-daily-population.pdf
9. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. (2026). Routes and schedules. https://www.vta.org/go/routes
10. City of San Jose Planning Division. (2026). Zoning map. https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/c23301b236d041d5a5358a5dce1e989d
11. City of San Jose Planning Division. (2026). General plan and zoning maps address lookup. https://csj.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/lookup/index.html?appid=ef685f767b484eb6bcfc70f8fb651ef6
12. City of San Jose. (2026). Council file 26-106, final adoption of ordinances. Legistar. https://sanjose.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?m=l&id=/matter.aspx?key=15499
13. California Secretary of State. (2026). Limited liability companies, California domestic, forms. https://www.sos.ca.gov/business-programs/business-entities/forms/limited-liability-companies-california-domestic
14. California Franchise Tax Board. (2026). Limited liability company. https://www.ftb.ca.gov/file/business/types/limited-liability-company/index.html
15. City of San Jose Finance Department. (2026). Business tax rates. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/finance/business-tax-registration/business-tax-rates
16. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 17.20.520, permit required and annual renewal. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17BUCO_CH17.20HOCO_PT8REOCPE_17.20.520PERE
17. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 17.20.510, compliance required. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17BUCO_CH17.20HOCO_PT8REOCPE_17.20.510CORE
18. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 20.200.1130, single housekeeping unit. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.200DE_20.200.1130SIHOUN
19. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2026). Fiscal year 2027 fair market rent schedule. HUD User. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr/fmr2027/FY2027_FMR_Schedule.pdf
20. California Association of Realtors. (2026). July 2026 home sales and price report. https://www.car.org/aboutus/mediacenter/newsreleases/2026releases/July2026HomeSales
21. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 24.01.120, adopted code editions and permit applications. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT24TECO_CH24.01AD_PT1GE_24.01.120EXPEAP
22. California Legislature. (2026). Health and Safety Code section 13113.7, smoke alarms. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=13113.7
23. California Legislature. (2026). Health and Safety Code section 17926, carbon monoxide devices. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=17926
24. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 24.02.610, use and occupancy. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT24TECO_CH24.02PE_PT6CEOC_24.02.610USOC
25. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 24.01.130, compliance with title required. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT24TECO_CH24.01AD_PT1GE_24.01.130COTIPRRE
26. Recovery Cafe San Jose. (2026). Our programs. https://recoverycafesj.org/get-recovery/our-programs/
27. California Consortium of Addiction Programs and Professionals. (2026). Start a recovery residence. https://ccapprecoveryresidences.org/start-recovery-residence/
28. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. (2026). Blue Line light rail. https://www.vta.org/go/routes/blue-line
29. City of San Jose Planning Division. (2026). Berryessa BART urban village area plan. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/planning-building-code-enforcement/planning-division/citywide-planning/urban-villages/berryessa-bart
30. Bay Area Rapid Transit. (2026). Berryessa/North San Jose station. https://www.bart.gov/stations/bery
31. City of San Jose Planning Division. (2026). Eastside Alum Rock urban village plan update. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/planning-building-code-enforcement/planning-division/citywide-planning/urban-villages/eastside-alum-rock-urban-village-plan-update
32. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. (2026). Orange Line light rail. https://www.vta.org/go/routes/orange-line
33. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. (2026). Rapid 522. https://www.vta.org/go/routes/rapid-522
34. City of San Jose. Tamien station area specific plan. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16067/636681597563400000
35. Caltrain. (2026). San Jose Diridon station. https://www.caltrain.com/station/sjdiridon
36. City of San Jose. (2025). Envision San Jose 2040 general plan. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/planning-building-code-enforcement/planning-division/citywide-planning/envision-san-jos-2040-general-plan
37. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority. (2026). Rapid 523. https://www.vta.org/go/routes/rapid-523
38. City of San Jose Planning Division. (2026). Evergreen-East Hills development policy. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/planning-building-code-enforcement/planning-division/citywide-planning/area-specific-plans/evergreen-east-hills-development-policy
39. California Department of Health Care Services. (2026). Licensing and certification complaints. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/individuals/licensing-and-certification-complaints/
40. California Legislature. (2026). Health and Safety Code section 11834.30. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=11834.30
41. California Consortium of Addiction Programs and Professionals. (2026). Certified recovery residence directory. https://ccapprecoveryresidences.org/search/
42. City of San Jose Planning Division. (2026). Zoning code, Title 20. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/planning-building-code-enforcement/planning-division/ordinances-proposed-updates/zoning-code-title-20
43. City of San Jose. (2026). Residential occupancy permit, multiple housing inspection program. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/planning-building-code-enforcement/code-enforcement/multiple-housing-inspection-program/residential-occupancy-permit
44. San Jose Fire Department. (2026). Fire prevention and permits. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/fire-department/fire-prevention-permits
45. City of San Jose Finance Department. (2026). Register for a business tax certificate. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/finance/business-tax-registration/register-for-a-business-tax-certificate
46. Santa Clara County Behavioral Health Services Department. (2026). Substance use treatment services for adults. https://bhsd.santaclaracounty.gov/services-group/adult-and-older-adult/substance-use-treatment-services-adults
47. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 20.200.1030, residential service facility. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.200DE_20.200.1030RESEFA
48. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 20.200.1010, residential care facility. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.200DE_20.200.1010RECAFA
49. City of San Jose Planning Division. (2026). Zoning ordinance update PP25-001. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/planning-building-code-enforcement/planning-division/ordinances-proposed-updates/zoning-ordinance-update-pp25-001
50. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 20.200.445, group home. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.200DE_20.200.445GRHO
51. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 17.20.500, applicability of the residential occupancy permit. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17BUCO_CH17.20HOCO_PT8REOCPE_17.20.500AP
52. California Legislature. (2026). Health and Safety Code section 1566.3. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=1566.3
53. City of Torrance v. Transitional Living Centers for Los Angeles, Inc., 30 Cal. 3d 516 (1982). Justia. https://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/3d/30/516.html
54. California Legislature. (2026). Health and Safety Code section 11834.23. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=11834.23
55. U.S. Department of Justice & U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1999). Joint statement on group homes, local land use, and the Fair Housing Act. https://www.justice.gov/crt/joint-statement-department-justice-and-department-housing-and-urban-development
56. California Legislature. (2026). Government Code section 65008, discrimination in land use. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=65008
57. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code chapter 20.160, requests for reasonable accommodation. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.160REREAC
58. California Department of Housing and Community Development, Housing Accountability Unit. (2025). City of San Jose group home ordinance (HAU #1749). https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/planning-and-community/HAU/san-jose-hau-1749-group-home-TA-092625.pdf
59. City of San Jose. (2026). Ordinance No. 31298, zoning ordinance amendments (PP25-001). https://legistar.granicus.com/sanjose/attachments/dc8070a6-10bb-449e-9d24-63ea2cf55235.pdf
60. City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc., 514 U.S. 725 (1995). Justia. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/514/725/
61. Pacific Shores Properties, LLC v. City of Newport Beach, 730 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2013). https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/09/20/11-55460.pdf
62. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of General Counsel. (2025). Memorandum on fair housing guidance. https://www.hud.gov/sites/default/files/hudclips/documents/OGC-Memo-on-Fair-Housing-Guidance-9-25-2025.pdf
63. SoCal Recovery, LLC v. City of Costa Mesa, No. 20-55820 (9th Cir. 2023). https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2023/01/03/20-55820.pdf
64. City of San Jose. (2026). Council file 26-951, PP25-008 reasonable accommodation ordinance. Legistar. https://sanjose.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?m=l&id=/matter.aspx?key=16250
65. County of Santa Clara. (2026). Zoning ordinance section 1.30.030, definitions of general terms. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/santa_clara_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TITCCODELAUS_APXIZO_ART1GEPR_CH1.30DEGETE_S1.30.030DETE
66. County of Santa Clara. (2026). Zoning ordinance section 2.10.040, community care use classifications. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/santa_clara_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TITCCODELAUS_APXIZO_ART2BADI_CH2.10DEUSCL_S2.10.040NSIUSCL
67. County of Santa Clara. (2026). Zoning ordinance section 2.10.030, residential use classifications. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/santa_clara_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TITCCODELAUS_APXIZO_ART2BADI_CH2.10DEUSCL_S2.10.030REUSCL
68. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code chapter 17.12, City of San Jose Fire Code. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17BUCO_CH17.12CISAJOFICO
69. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 24.02.620, change in use. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT24TECO_CH24.02PE_PT6CEOC_24.02.620CHUS
70. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 17.20.450, fire detection systems in residential buildings. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17BUCO_CH17.20HOCO_PT7FIDESY_17.20.450FIDESYREESBU
71. California Legislature. (2026). Health and Safety Code section 17926.1, owner maintenance duties. California Legislative Information. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=17926.1
72. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 17.12.630, amendment to section 903 of the 2025 California Fire Code. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17BUCO_CH17.12CISAJOFICO_PT6FIPRSUALDE_17.12.630AMSE9032025CAFICO
73. California Building Standards Commission. (2026). California building standards code, Title 24. Department of General Services. https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Codes
74. City of San Jose. (2026). San Jose Municipal Code section 24.02.440, investigation fees for work without a permit. Municode. https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT24TECO_CH24.02PE_PT4FE_24.02.440INFEWOWIPE
75. California Secretary of State. (2026). Forms, samples and fees for business entities. https://www.sos.ca.gov/business-programs/business-entities/forms
76. Missouri Economic Research and Information Center. (2026). Cost of living data series. https://meric.mo.gov/data/cost-living-data-series
77. County of Santa Clara Procurement Department. (2026). Vendor registration. https://prc.santaclaracounty.gov/doing-business-county/vendor-registration
78. Housing Authority of the County of Santa Clara. (2026). Section 8 payment standards. https://www.scchousingauthority.org/section-8/payment-standards/
79. Freddie Mac. (2026). Primary mortgage market survey. https://www.freddiemac.com/pmms
80. Santa Clara County Behavioral Health Services Department. (2026). Talk to someone now. https://bhsd.santaclaracounty.gov/get-help-now/talk-someone-now
81. County of Santa Clara. (2026). eSourcing supplier portal. Biddingo. https://biddingo.com/santaclaracounty
82. Santa Clara County Behavioral Health Services Department. (2026). Find treatment for substance use. https://bhsd.santaclaracounty.gov/services-group/adult-and-older-adult/find-treatment-substance-use
83. Santa Clara County Office of Diversion and Reentry Services. (2026). Services. https://reentry.santaclaracounty.gov/services
84. Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara. (2026). Collaborative courts. https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/divisions/collaborative-courts
85. Santa Clara County Probation Department. (2026). Adult services programs and services. https://pro.santaclaracounty.gov/adult-services/programs-services
86. Santa Clara County Office of Supportive Housing. (2026). Get assistance. https://osh.santaclaracounty.gov/get-assistance/get-assistance
87. Santa Clara Valley Healthcare. (2026). Valley homeless healthcare program. https://www.scvh.org/hospitals-clinics/locations/ambulatory-clinics/valley-homeless-health-care-program-vhhp
88. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2026). Homeless veteran care, VA Palo Alto Health Care System. https://www.va.gov/palo-alto-health-care/health-services/homeless-veteran-care/
89. City of San Jose Housing Department. (2026). Homelessness response. https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-government/departments-offices/housing/homelessness-response
90. Pathway Society. (2026). Services. https://pathwaysociety.org/services
91. Momentum for Health. (2026). How we can help. https://momentumforhealth.org/how-we-can-help/
92. Bill Wilson Center. (2026). Housing programs. https://www.billwilsoncenter.org/services/housing-programs.html
93. HomeFirst. (2026). Our work in Santa Clara County. https://www.homefirstservices.org/our-work/santa-clara-county
94. Intergroup Central Office of Santa Clara County. (2026). Central office. Alcoholics Anonymous. https://aasanjose.org/central-office
95. Greater San Jose Area Narcotics Anonymous. (2026). Greater San Jose area service committee. https://www.sjna.org/